Check the claim, then the sentence.

1. Scope and source check

The reviewer identifies the product, market, question and source category. Important regulatory and scientific claims are checked against primary sources where available.

2. Data classification

Each quantity is labelled as product-label data, third-party data, a user report, research, a calculation, an assumption or an illustrative example. Mixed categories are separated before analysis.

3. Method check

Inputs, unit conversions, exclusions, sample size, formula, rounding and uncertainty are compared with the published methodology. A method that has not met its threshold remains pending.

4. Claim check

The reviewer tests whether the conclusion follows from the available evidence. Universal language, motive claims and health implications require direct support or are removed.

5. Editorial and technical check

Headings, interface copy, metadata and structured data are aligned. Links, canonical URLs, accessibility attributes, source attribution and JavaScript behaviour are checked.

6. Subject review

Statistical, legal, regulatory or nutrition review is added when the claim requires it. If no named qualified reviewer has completed that work, the article says review pending.

7. Publication and follow-up

Articles display the evidence-check date, last review, next review, limitations and corrections link. Material source or method changes trigger an earlier review.

Review frequency

Static editorial pages are scheduled for review at least every three months during active development. Live product data carries its retrieval date and may update more often.

Current review status

The repository-wide editorial review was completed on July 14, 2026. Independent statistical, legal and subject-matter reviews identified on individual pages remain pending.